In the end, you just have to
be a punk. Growing up in the American culture, I have come to learn that you
are only told so much and what you are told usually has an agenda. Ethics are
usually introduced through ones upbringing within a religion. Through religion,
both Virtue Ethics and Duty-Based Ethics are employed in order to keep the
recipient away from evils, of both this world and others. If one remains
faithful to their religion not only will they be accepted into heaven but they
will also be considered an award-winning citizen of the society. As I turned
fifteen, these things that I had been told did not seem to ever really sink in,
and initially, struck with some fear, I thought, “If I do not abide by this
religion, then what is truly right or wrong?” It was that moment, as a young fifteen-year-old
girl, in middle class suburban America, that I became a punk. I realized then
all that had been taught to me about these ethics was rather indirect, as it
reflected upon some external authority to reveal the good and the bad, rather
than an asking of ones self.
After reading about the
Classic Categories, I was still unsure about which is the most sensible
position, even after six previous years of experience and internal debate. Most
all of them require one to admit to their participation in an external setting
– if one wants to reap the benefits of a society, one must feel some type of
duty towards the others and the authority within the society, if one wants to
reach the gates of heaven one must obey the commandments of god. I am more
curious though where one is to look if they do not wish to indirectly reflect
upon some external setting. As for my disposition, I have yet to be convinced
of any other worlds to which I may wish to travel and I am also quite unsure
about just how beneficial this
society actually is for me. So here I am, some punk, still asking of myself
about these ethics. In the end, I would have to side with some kind of Virtue
theory, as I am most concerned with Wisdom rather than anything else. I am
convinced through the readings of both Plato and Aristotle that a seeker of
wisdom is in some way dependent on a functioning society. If everyone where
free to act upon every feverish whim of their twenty-first century soul, this
world would implode and if that happens I would no longer be able to
communicate with others, or share similar values with others, who are also
lovers of wisdom.
My ethics do not revolve
around society, a god, or some agenda but rather purely and simply around my
self – which luckily, for the rest of society, is mostly concerned with
learning, reading, writing, and creating a good character which will continue
to enable to highest performance of all such things. So, I am a punk, who
disregards most everything for the noble sake of wisdom – if it does not lead
me there, I surely have no such use for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment