Normative Ethics: the decision between what is right and
what is wrong based on virtue, duty, or consequentialist theories. As I
discussed in prior content, I find myself to make decisions based on virtue and
what feels right as a result of my upbringing. Taking a look at the movie
Source Code, this thought of mine was challenged. It is safe to say that I have
never had to make a decision or hopefully will never have to make the decision
to use a dead person’s mind for the good of an entire country, but as I watched
this movie, I was forced to question what the right decision would be in this
situation.
After finishing Source Code, I was very confident in my
thought that he should not be kept alive even though it would be for the
benefit of an entire country. Goodwin was right. Colter gave his life to serve
our country and while he had the ability to go back to tragic situations and
capture the harmful people in our country, it does not feel morally right to
continue to keep him “alive” against his will. Goodwin’s thoughts reminded me
much of virtue and duty ethics whereas Rutledge was coming from the mindset of
consequentialism. Rutdlege wanted to focus on the more favorable situation to a
larger group of people whereas Goodwin felt it was wrong to go against the word
of Colter and keep using him.
Source Code supports the common issue in this world of conflicting
values and ideals on what is right or wrong. It proves that everyone approaches
situations and decisions with different ideas backing them up. The obvious
choice of what to do for one person can make absolutely no sense to someone
else and that simply comes from the fact that the truly do not see eye to eye
in the normative ethics of the situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment